ReviewCureus2025
Congenital Versus Isolated Traumatic Radial Head Dislocation in Adults: A Diagnostic Dilemma With an Algorithmic Approach.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital radial head dislocation (CRHD) is a rare elbow condition that often remains undiagnosed until adulthood due to its asymptomatic nature. In contrast, isolated traumatic radial head dislocation (TRHD) is another uncommon entity that results from an elbow injury. Given their rarity and overlapping clinical features, distinguishing CRHD from isolated TRHD, particularly in adults with a history of trauma, poses a significant diagnostic dilemma. This review aims to enhance awareness about both conditions, and it is the first to address an in-depth comparison. A novel dual-algorithm approach is proposed as well to overcome the diagnostic challenges and guide clinicians' decisions. PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify reported cases of CRHD and isolated TRHD in adults. Key aspects, including epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies, were analyzed. Two diagnostic algorithms were developed based on clinical and radiographic parameters. CRHD is often asymptomatic until adulthood, typically lacks a history of trauma, shows bilateral involvement, and is frequently associated with congenital abnormalities. Conversely, isolated TRHD presents acutely with pain and a restricted range of motion (ROM) post-trauma. Imaging findings are crucial to differentiate the former two entities. Treatment differs significantly; CRHD is typically managed conservatively unless symptomatic, while isolated TRHD often requires closed reduction, with surgery reserved for irreducible cases or instability. CRHD and isolated TRHD in adults are exceptionally rare, and differentiation is crucial for proper management. This review highlights the diagnostic challenges of CRHD first identified in adulthood and emphasizes the value of clinical suspicion, imaging, and individualized treatment planning. Finally, the dual-algorithm approach provides the first structured diagnostic model to assist differential diagnosis of CRHD and isolated TRHD in adults, offering a cost-effective pathway and a more comprehensive option when initial evaluation is inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.