ArticleCureus2025
Use of Diperoxochloric Acid as a Novel Therapy for the Treatment of Infected Traumatic Foot Ulcers: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infected traumatic foot ulcers present a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with delayed presentation, suboptimal hygiene, or comorbidities like diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. Conventional management includes wound debridement, systemic antibiotics, and advanced dressings, often with variable success. Diperoxochloric acid (DPA), a potent oxidizing agent with broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, has recently gained attention for its potential in promoting wound healing while simultaneously reducing the microbial load. In this case series, we present four patients with moderate to severe infected foot ulcers following trauma, all of whom showed minimal improvement after at least 14 days of standard wound care and systemic antibiotic therapy. Upon introduction of topical DPA as an adjunctive treatment along with serial wound debridement, all cases demonstrated significant clinical improvement, with a rapid reduction in wound size (average decrease of 60% within three weeks), resolution of infection, and progressive granulation leading to complete healing in an average of 6.5 weeks. Compared to traditional antiseptics, DPA offers several advantages, including reduced cytotoxicity, sustained antimicrobial activity, and enhanced wound bed preparation, making it a compelling adjunct in chronic and infected wound care. This series highlights the potential of DPA as a cost-effective, efficient, and well-tolerated adjunct in the multidisciplinary management of infected traumatic foot ulcers. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to further elucidate optimal protocols, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.