Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995249›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Polypharmacy Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Kyle Bringhurst, Talaya Jones, Gerard Runko, Matthew Jabbari, Nicoletta Zipparro, Gia Nghi Vo, Aman Ullah, Tri Minh Vo, Maxwell Corrigan, Vince Birrey and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kyle BringhurstDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Talaya JonesDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Gerard RunkoDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Matthew JabbariDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Nicoletta ZipparroDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Gia Nghi VoDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Aman UllahDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Tri Minh VoDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Maxwell CorriganDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Vince BirreyDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Robin J JacobsDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) presents an opportunity to enhance the management of multiple medications for patients. Despite the growing body of research on the clinical impact and accuracy of AI in healthcare, current literature is limited in addressing AI's role in medication management for older adults. The goal of this scoping review was to assess the extent and applicability of AI applications in managing multiple pharmacological therapies among adults aged 50 and older. Relevant articles were searched in EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Search phrases included "polypharmacy/polytherapy", "artificial intelligence in healthcare", "machine learning/language learning", and "elderly populations". The search initially identified 58 citations. After a systemized and rigorous screening process, 12 articles were further screened for eligibility and critically appraised for bias and appropriateness. Of those, a total of five articles were retained for the final analysis. They focused on the application of AI and web-based applications to reduce inappropriate medication use and drug interactions, how machine learning and audio-based activity recognition systems could improve medication adherence among older adults, and recognizable patterns between multimorbidity and polypharmacy in elderly populations with chronic illnesses. The main findings of this review suggested that AI tools have demonstrated efficiency and accuracy in eliminating drug-drug interactions, assisting in the detection of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and identifying patterns of multimorbidity due to polypharmacy in older adults. Moreover, AI tools were considered easy to use and helped enhance medication adherence. Results suggest that AI has potential in managing polypharmacy, particularly in enhancing medication safety, improving adherence, and predicting risk factors for medication-related errors in older adults. Future investigations are needed that focus on AI's long-term effect on patient outcomes, its role in personalized pharmacotherapy, and ongoing challenges related to algorithmic transparency, bias mitigation, and regulatory oversight. As AI continues to evolve, its integration into healthcare would benefit from methodical evaluation, stringent oversight, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure its safe and effective deployment in patient care.

Indexed as

aidrug-drug interactiongeriatrichealth technologylarge language model (llm)machine learning (ml)multiple medicationolder adultspatient managementpharmaceutical management

Identifiers

PMID40995249
PMCPMC12455687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.