Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995235›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2025

Legislation for forensic investigative genetic genealogy in Sweden.

Ricky Ansell, Siri Aili Fagerholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ricky AnsellDepartment of Physics, Chemistry & Biology (IFM), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Siri Aili FagerholmThe Swedish Police Authority, National Forensic Centre (NFC), Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweden was in 2019 the first country outside of North America to use forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) in solving a crime. However, further use of the method was inhibited in 2021 by the Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection Authority (IMY), following a mandatory prior consultation process. This decision was due to a considered lack of legislative support as well as issues regarding the transfer of sensitive personal data to a third country. Subsequently, method implementation was put on hold awaiting necessary legal review and amendments. In July 2024, the Swedish Justice Department presented a legal bill on the Police Authority use of FIGG, with only slight changes in relation to the considerations presented by a previous national committee on law enforcement use of biometrics. The legislation distinctly passed parliament vote February 2025 and it will gain force on July 1, 2025. Due to its sensitive nature the use of FIGG will be limited to the most severe offences; murder and aggravated rape, as a last resort and only following a prerequisite of "absolute necessity". This paper describes the coming legislation on the use of FIGG in Sweden, discussing some parts of the constitutional comments and limitations seen, and describing implementation of FIGG within Swedish law enforcement.

Indexed as

DNAFIGGForensic investigative genetic genealogyLaw enforcement

Identifiers

PMID40995235
PMCPMC12454905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.