ArticleBJUI compass2025
Metabolic abnormalities in pure vs. mixed struvite stone formers: A retrospective comparative analysis utilising large language models for data extraction.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staged transurethral surgery for complete stone clearance in a rare giant infected ureteral stone: a case report.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Metabolic abnormalities in pure vs. mixed struvite stone formers: A retrospective comparative analysis utilising large language models for data extraction.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate demographic characteristics and the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities in patients with pure struvite stones compared to those with mixed struvite and calcium oxalate stones. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3001 stone analyses performed at our institution between August 2019 and April 2024. Patients who had a 24-hour urinary stone risk profile within six months of stone analysis were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of nephrolithiasis, bladder stones, neurogenic bladder or surgery for encrusted stent removal. Demographics, comorbidities and laboratory values were extracted using a HIPAA-compliant pipeline enhanced with a large language model (LLM). Patients with pure struvite stones were compared to those with mixed calcium oxalate-struvite stones. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio v4.1.3. Results: Forty-one patients met the inclusion criteria: 21 with pure struvite stones and 20 with mixed stones. While pure struvite stones were more common in females, the difference was not statistically significant. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. Patients with pure struvite stones showed lower urinary levels of oxalate, potassium, citrate and uric acid, though not statistically significant. However, supersaturation of brushite, calcium oxalate and sodium urate was significantly lower in the pure struvite group (P < 0.05). At least one metabolic abnormality was present in 90.5% of the pure struvite group and in all patients with mixed stones. Conclusions: Metabolic abnormalities are highly prevalent in both pure and mixed struvite stone formers. These findings support routine metabolic evaluation in patients with infection-related stones to guide long-term management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.