ArticleOchsner journal2025
Using Machine Learning to Identify Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Dialysis Facility Outcomes Across the United States.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite progress in dialysis care, the patient outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, and readmission rates remain unsatisfactory because of complex clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic interactions. For this study, we used unsupervised machine learning to identify clusters of dialysis facilities based on quality metrics and sociodemographic factors, with attention to racial and geographic disparities. Methods: We sourced facility-level data from data.cms.gov and sourced ZIP Code Tabulation Area-level sociodemographic data from the 2021 American Community Survey via the US Census Bureau application programming interface. Datasets were linked by ZIP code, standardized, and analyzed using principal component analysis and k-means clustering. We examined geographic patterns by US Census Bureau regions. Analyses were conducted in Python version 3.11.6 (Python Software Foundation) with the following libraries: pandas for data manipulation, scikit-learn for machine learning and principal component analysis, Matplotlib and Seaborn for data visualization, and GeoPandas for geographic mapping and spatial analysis. Results: Two facility clusters emerged: Cluster 0 (n=4,609) and Cluster 1 (n=2,857). Cluster 1 was characterized by poorer outcomes (higher mortality, hospitalization, readmission, anemia, catheter use, and hyperphosphatemia); lower rates of fistula use; and lower dialysis adequacy compared to Cluster 0. Cluster 1 facilities were more prevalent in regions with lower income, higher unemployment, and lower college education, and they served populations with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic residents. Geographically, Cluster 1 facilities were concentrated in the southern and western United States. Compared to Cluster 0, a larger share of Cluster 1 facilities were for-profit facilities (91.4% vs 88.5%). Conclusion: This study highlights a distinct cluster of underperforming dialysis clinics serving socioeconomically disadvantaged and racially diverse populations. Addressing these disparities requires multifaceted strategies including patient-level, institutional, and policy-level interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.