ArticleiScience2025
A magnetotactic bacterium capable of magnetic sensing.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetosensitive organisms have the ability to sense and respond actively to features of magnetic fields such as the direction or magnitude. Until now, magnetosensing has been characterized primarily in higher organisms, involving either a cryptochrome-based mechanism or direct magnetic interactions with magnetic particles. Magnetotactic bacteria, microorganisms forming intracellular chains of magnetic nanoparticles, are thought to only passively orient along field lines. In this study, we reveal that the cultivated magnetotactic bacterium SS-5 also exhibits magnetosensing. The microorganisms indeed swim faster in a physiological magnetic field compared to when the field is canceled. This speed difference is independent of illumination wavelength but is altered when the bacterial magnetic backbone is disrupted. We thus propose that magnetosensing in the bacteria originates from a magnetomechanical signal transduction along the magnetotactic filament. Our findings also show that this response depends on relative changes in magnetic field intensity, akin to the Weber-Fechner laws, suggesting that magnetosensing operates similarly to other forms of taxes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.