ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion as a valuable approach in patients with unstable type 1 diabetes: two case reports and a mini review of the literature.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) has become a valid therapeutic option to achieve good glycemic control for patients with unstable type 1 diabetes and subcutaneous insulin resistance, mainly due to the absorption of insulin through the portal venous system. This route improves hepatic uptake and reduces peripheral plasma insulin levels, also optimizing glucagon secretion and hepatic glucose production. CIPII can lead to better blood glucose control and more predictable insulin profiles, especially after meals, compared to subcutaneous injections. Therefore, some studies suggest that CIPII may reduce the risk of hypoglycemia compared to subcutaneous insulin as well as improving patient satisfaction. Actually, among CIPII delivery systems, DiaPort particularly stands out for its low side effects, proven clinical efficacy, and potential for integration into closed-loop systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.