ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The clinical value of CT and MRI in preoperative TNM staging of esophageal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of CT radiomics and machine learning for preoperative T staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative TNM staging of esophageal carcinoma. Methods: A total of 1,209 patients with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer who underwent preoperative CT ( Results: For T-stage, the overall accuracy of CT was 86%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 53 and 89%, respectively. MRI achieved an accuracy of 82%, with sensitivity and specificity of 57 and 93%, respectively. For N-stage, CT showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85, 83, and 84% for mediastinal lymph nodes, and 87, 82, and 83% for abdominal lymph nodes. There was no significant difference in the total accuracy rate of TN staging diagnosis of esophageal cancer between the two groups. Conclusion: Both CT and MRI demonstrate high diagnostic value in the preoperative TNM stage of esophageal carcinoma. While CT is more economic and easier to operate, MRI offers superior contrast of connective tissues and multiplanar imaging, making it particularly valuable in evaluating T4 stage and assessing tumor invasion of adjacent organs. Limitations exist in early T-stage and N-stage assessments due to difficulty distinguishing mucosal infiltration and differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymphadenopathy. Multimodal imaging strategies and tumor-targeted contrast agents may enhance staging precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.