Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

FedCMC: a federated learning model with contribution fairness based on multi-center core data extraction for assessing the myometrial invasion status of endometrial cancer.

Yuping Li, Bao Feng, Yuan Chen, Xiaohong Ruan, Jiangfeng Shi, Ximiao Wang, Xianyan Wen, Peijun Li, Junqi Sun, Changye Zheng and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yuping Li *School of Electronic Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Bao Feng *Laboratory of Intelligent Detection and Information Processing, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Yuan Chen *Department of Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaohong RuanDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Jiangfeng ShiSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ximiao WangJiangmen Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Computation and Application, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Xianyan WenDepartment of Radiology, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Peijun LiDepartment of Radiology, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Junqi SunDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Changye ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Yujian ZouDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Mingwei LiDepartment of Gynecology, Kaiping Central Hospital, Kaiping, Guangdong, China.
Wansheng LongJiangmen Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Computation and Application, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Yehang ChenLaboratory of Intelligent Detection and Information Processing, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Dong XieCollege of Science, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multi-center Federated Learning (FL) has played a significant role in disease prediction, offering a feasible solution to the challenges of cross-institutional collaboration. However, the fairness issues inherent in traditional FL frameworks have limited their further development in the medical field. Methods: We propose a Contribution Fairness Federated Learning model based on Multi-center Core Data Extraction (FedCMC). This model accurately assesses the actual contributions of each center from both data and model perspectives using two fairness indicators: data information richness and model quality. In the data contribution assessment phase, we innovatively design a Multi-center Core Data Extraction Module (MCDEM). This module extracts representative core datasets from the original training pool, effectively filtering redundant information and enhancing the fairness of data contribution assessment and the model's generalization ability. Subsequently, weighted aggregation based on each center's contribution optimizes the benefits for high-contribution centers, incentivizing more users to participate in federated learning. Finally, a personalized federated learning strategy is adopted, enabling the model to fine-tune through each center's core dataset, thereby improving its prediction relevance and accuracy. Results: We analyze data from 902 endometrial cancer (EC) patients across four independent medical institutions. In centers A, B, and C, the FedCMC model achieves areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.8261, 0.8750, and 0.8964, respectively. Comparative analysis with three traditional federated learning algorithms indicates that FedCMC offers significant advantages in both performance and fairness. Conclusion: FedCMC effectively alleviates fairness issues in traditional FL frameworks and accurately predicts the myometrial invasion (MI) status of EC patients, supporting personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

core data extractionendometrial cancerfairnessfederated learningmyometrial invasionpersonalized treatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID40994938
PMCPMC12454072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.