ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
FedCMC: a federated learning model with contribution fairness based on multi-center core data extraction for assessing the myometrial invasion status of endometrial cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-center Federated Learning (FL) has played a significant role in disease prediction, offering a feasible solution to the challenges of cross-institutional collaboration. However, the fairness issues inherent in traditional FL frameworks have limited their further development in the medical field. Methods: We propose a Contribution Fairness Federated Learning model based on Multi-center Core Data Extraction (FedCMC). This model accurately assesses the actual contributions of each center from both data and model perspectives using two fairness indicators: data information richness and model quality. In the data contribution assessment phase, we innovatively design a Multi-center Core Data Extraction Module (MCDEM). This module extracts representative core datasets from the original training pool, effectively filtering redundant information and enhancing the fairness of data contribution assessment and the model's generalization ability. Subsequently, weighted aggregation based on each center's contribution optimizes the benefits for high-contribution centers, incentivizing more users to participate in federated learning. Finally, a personalized federated learning strategy is adopted, enabling the model to fine-tune through each center's core dataset, thereby improving its prediction relevance and accuracy. Results: We analyze data from 902 endometrial cancer (EC) patients across four independent medical institutions. In centers A, B, and C, the FedCMC model achieves areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.8261, 0.8750, and 0.8964, respectively. Comparative analysis with three traditional federated learning algorithms indicates that FedCMC offers significant advantages in both performance and fairness. Conclusion: FedCMC effectively alleviates fairness issues in traditional FL frameworks and accurately predicts the myometrial invasion (MI) status of EC patients, supporting personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.