ArticleGeotechnical and geological engineering2025
Effects of Displacement Piles for Dike Reinforcement on Adjacent Buildings.
Article in Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation into the use of displacement piles as a reinforcement measure for river dikes founded on soft soil, with a particular focus on geotechnical performance, macro stability, and impacts on nearby buildings. A finite element model is developed using parameters derived from a representative Dutch dike case (Bergambacht), incorporating the Hardening Soil, Soft Soil Creep and NGI-ADP-SHANSEP models to capture soil behaviour. Pile installation is simulated through the application of lateral volumetric strain, with varying pile diameters, spacings, and locations within the dike profile. The equivalent diameters used in the analysis range from 10 to 40 cm, corresponding to pile walls with diameters between 25.5 and 100 cm when the spacing equals the diameter. The pile wall location varies from the dike toe up to 21 m away, which is at the outer crest, with a varied length reaching -12 m NAP. A two-storey building on deep pile foundations is included to assess the effect of installation-induced displacements, with its location ranging from 5 to 20 m from the dike toe. Results show that positioning the pile wall within the inner slope offers the best balance between increased factor of safety, reduced required pile length, and acceptable levels of deformation. However, the installation process can generate significant horizontal displacements, particularly near the dike toe, which may compromise adjacent structures. The study finds that displacement piles are unsuitable within 10-15 m of existing buildings unless smaller pile diameters or alternative installation methods are used. Soil stiffness and installation-induced stresses also play a key role, highlighting the importance of site-specific assessments and careful design calibration using field data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.