ArticleMethods in Psychology (Online)2025
Honoring childhood agency in developmental research: Best practices, applications, and insights.
Article in Methods in Psychology (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "I make those in my imagination": A guide to prioritizing children's agency and inclusion in research with the Make-and-Tell arts-based method.International journal of qualitative methodsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric research requires caregivers to provide informed consent on behalf of their children. While not a formal requirement for children under the age of seven, it is important to involve child participants in the assent and decision-making processes in developmentally appropriate ways. This is especially important in longitudinal research, where the extent to which a developing child understands study tasks evolves over time. Although there is consensus that assent procedures are important and necessary, limited resources synthesizing strategies for pediatric researchers to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for young children exist. We describe methods used in an ongoing longitudinal study following caregiver-infant dyads from gestation through five years of child age. Study visits include repeated assessment of children's behavioral, cognitive, and physical development. Additionally, we describe observations from a study that used art-based approaches to enhance agency during study visits with five-to ten-year-olds. We describe methods for promoting agency in research contexts including potential modifications based on developmental milestone achievement. We detail strategies for assessing and responding to child behaviors that may indicate dissent. By synthesizing this information, we provide a comprehensive resource that may be used to encourage positive and respectful research experiences for children. Such experiences are likely to improve data quality and retention and uphold developmental research ethics. Further, this work contributes to a larger conversation about child agency, which has been occurring for decades across academic disciplines. Promoting children's agency in research also has potential to promote healthy long-term outcomes for developing children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.