Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Previous abortion and preeclampsia in Kigali, Rwanda: a case-control study.

Anas M Bakhiet, Nadiah AlHabardi, Ishag Adam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anas M BakhietFaculty of Medicine, University of Medical Science and Technology, Kigali, Rwanda.
Nadiah AlHabardiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Ishag AdamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the association between previous spontaneous abortion and preeclampsia among pregnant women in Rwanda. Methods: A case (preeclampsia)-control (healthy pregnant women) study with 188 women per group was conducted at Kacyiru Hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. Data were collected using questionnaires, and multivariate binary analysis was performed. Results: There was no significant difference in age and parity between the case and control groups. In the case group, 29 (15.4%) and 13 (6.9%) women and 16 (8.5%) and 2 (1.1%) women in the control group had a history of one abortion or two or more abortions, respectively. A multivariate binary regression analysis revealed that women with a history of abortion had a higher risk of preeclampsia compared to their peers who had no history of abortion [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-5.27]. Women with one past abortion (AOR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.12-4.86) and those with two or more past abortions (AOR = 8.29, 95% CI: 1.73-39.63) had a higher risk of preeclampsia. Women with a history of preeclampsia who were rural residents or had an increasing body mass index showed a higher risk of preeclampsia. Conclusion: A history of abortion is associated with preeclampsia. Women with a history of abortion have to receive more frequent care, looking for the development of pre-eclampsia.

Indexed as

agepreeclampsiapregnancyrisk factorspontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID40994917
PMCPMC12454433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.