ArticleEJHaem2025
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Triple-Class-Exposed and BCMA-Exposed Multiple Myeloma Within the United States.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing ciltacabtagene autoleucel outcomes: real-world experience and best practices from a single academic center.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A novel therapy for heavily pretreated triple-class-exposed multiple myeloma (TCE MM) is B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted immunotherapy. While the number of TCE+BCMA-exposed patients is growing, real-world data for this group are limited. Methods: We present real-world data from patients with TCE+BCMA-exposed MM who initiated a subsequent line of therapy (LOT) using a US-based claims database, Komodo's Healthcare Map. Results: We identified 656 TCE+BCMA-exposed patients; mean age was 66.5 years. Time from MM diagnosis to index was 5.4 years; mean number of prior LOTs was 5.9. The most prevalent prior therapy received within each drug class was daratumumab (98.5%), pomalidomide (86.0%), carfilzomib (85.8%) and belantamab mafodotin (74.5%). A total of 137 different subsequent treatment regimens were observed following TCE+BCMA exposure; the most common regimen was teclistamab (10.4%). The top three targeted agents within the subsequent regimen were carfilzomib (20.2%), pomalidomide (20.1%) and bortezomib (16.6%). Among this TCE+BCMA-exposed population who received subsequent treatment, the median time to next treatment or death was 6.8 (95% CI, 6.1-7.5) months; time to treatment discontinuation or death was 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.7) months. Conclusion: This first real-world analysis of patients with heavily pretreated TCE+BCMA-exposed MM shows poor clinical outcomes, frequent therapy retreatment and no standard-of-care, highlighting the need for novel treatments. Clinical Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.