Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994907›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025

An unusual pelvic mass.

Marie-Véronique Poirier, Vikram B Chakravarthy, Floor Backes

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie-Véronique PoirierThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vikram B ChakravarthyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Floor BackesThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The differential diagnosis for a solid pelvic mass is broad and includes non-gynecologic masses such as retroperitoneal schwannoma. Theses benign nerve-sheath tumors can be mistaken for adnexal masses or cause non-specific bulk symptoms, which may lead patients to present to their Ob/Gyn or ultimately be referred to gynecologic oncologists for evaluation and possible resection. Cases: We discuss two cases of pelvic schwannoma: a 79-year-old woman who initially presented with a two-year history of left lower extremity cramping, paresthesia, and back pain, and a 40-year-old woman with right-sided flank pain and worsening dysmenorrhea, who presented with initial concern for adnexal mass. Conclusion: The differential diagnosis for a smooth, fixed, pre-sacral or sidewall mass on pelvic exam includes pelvic schwannoma. These nerve sheath tumors are typically benign; however, can cause a variety of symptoms due to regional mass effect and may significantly impact quality of life. Associated symptoms, if present, may be non-specific or difficult to localize (i.e. pelvic pain/fullness, urinary symptoms, constipation, and radiculopathy), which can lead to a delay in diagnosis if a comprehensive pelvic exam is not performed or if suspicion for an etiology of non-gynecologic origin is not considered. Recommended workup includes pelvic MRI followed by CT-guided biopsy. Management is guided by the patient's symptoms; if surgery is warranted, a minimally invasive, interdisciplinary approach is strongly preferred.

Identifiers

PMID40994907
PMCPMC12454607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.