Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025
Lidocaine-Based vs Sufentanil-Based PCIA After Pulmonary Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of Intravenous Lidocaine, Ketamine, and Magnesium for Acute Pain Control After Lung Resection Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), compared with sufentanil-based PCIA on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. Methods: We recruited 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery who were randomized to receive lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h) or sufentanil-based PCIA (2 μg/mL) within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual analogue scores (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and other prespecified endpoints were also recorded. Results: VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing in the lidocaine group were significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively ( Conclusion: Compared with sufentanil-based PCIA, lidocaine-based PCIA significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved recovery quality after thoracoscopic lung surgery with fewer postoperative adverse events, which is a considerable choice for postoperative analgesia. Trial Registration: This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 1st, 2023 (number ChiCTR2300068840).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.