Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994891›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Comparative analysis of phage cocktail activity against uropathogenic

Steven Arcidiacono, Robert Stote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven ArcidiaconoDEVCOM Soldier Center, 10 General Greene Avenue, Natick, MA 01760 USA.
Robert StoteDEVCOM Soldier Center, 10 General Greene Avenue, Natick, MA 01760 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spot overlay assays are a common method for measuring phage activity against target microorganisms and determining % host range activity. Dilutions of phage demonstrate activity by creating a zone of clearing indicative of bacterial killing; however, this yields only semi-quantitative results for each target strain tested. In addition, zones can be completely clear or incomplete cloudy zones of varying intensity. These factors make it difficult to compare the overall strength of activity between monophages or phage cocktails when numerous bacterial strains are involved. Here we demonstrate a method to analyze spot overlay results to provide insight beyond just host range activity; three phage cocktails with host range activity of 92-96 % had different overall activities. While the spot overlay is a qualitative assay, consolidation of activity results can derive semi-quantitative information. This method converts activity of phage dilutions from a spot overlay assay into an overall activity of cocktails for comparison. Our method:•Uses standard laboratory protocol for analysis•Expands information beyond host range activity•Consolidates results of all strains tested to assess overall cocktail strength of activity for comparison.

Indexed as

Cocktail activityComparative analysisHost rangePhage cocktailsSpot overlay assayZones of clearing

Identifiers

PMID40994891
PMCPMC12454445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.