ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Dynamics of language grounding: on the time course, durability, adaptability, and vulnerability of embodied effects.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From an embodiment stance, semantic processes reactivate specialized brain networks supporting daily experiences. While this general claim has been amply supported, key questions remain unanswered regarding the time course, durability, adaptability, and vulnerability of the underlying mechanisms. This work reviews the main findings on these topics, based on behavioral, neuropsychological, neuroanatomical, hemodynamic, magnetoencephalographic, electroencephalographic, and intracranial methods. The evidence suggests that language-induced sensorimotor reactivations are (a) primary and extended during the temporal flow of meaning, (b) enduring as an anchor for verbal learning throughout life, (c) responsive to individual experiences, and (d) selectively vulnerable to diverse brain alterations. Such conclusions have theoretical, educational, and clinical implications, affording constraints for neurolinguistic models, innovations in language teaching, and early markers of brain disorders. These insights deepen our understanding of the neurocognitive phenomena shaping daily language use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.