ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Heterogeneity of dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style and its negative emotional characteristics among college students: based on latent profile analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Narrative Review of Psychological and Physical Rehabilitation in Infertility Treatment: Toward Holistic Outcomes Beyond Conception.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- College students' psychological resilience and daily recovery: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style has an important impact on the quality of college students' dormitory interpersonal relationships and emotional experiences. Still, previous studies have ignored the individual differences among college student groups, making it difficult to effectively classify these groups from the perspective of dormitory conflict coping style. This study aims to explore the potential categories of conflict coping styles in college students' dormitories and their demographic characteristics, and to analyze the emotional differences among college students in different types of dormitory conflict coping groups, with the expectation of providing theoretical references for improving interpersonal relationships in college students' dormitories. Methods: A convenience cluster sampling method was used to select 1,408 college students from a university in Anhui Province, China, to conduct an online survey. The Dormitory Interpersonal Relationship Questionnaire, the Dormitory Interpersonal Conflict Coping Style Questionnaire, and the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale Short Chinese Version were used for the investigation. First, we used "individual-centered" latent profile analysis to explore the categories of dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style; second, we used multifactorial binary logistic regression to explore the relationship between demographic variables and the potential categorization of dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style; and lastly, we used a difference-in-differences test to explore the emotional characteristics of different dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style groups. Results: The dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style group of Chinese college students was divided into two potential categories: the positive coping group (85.01%, 1,197 students) and the negative coping group (14.99%, 211 students). The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that gender, grade, and type of specialty were all correlated with dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style in college: male students (OR = 1.86), senior students (OR sophomore = 1.44; OR juniors = 1.70), and non-literature and history majors (OR science and engineering = 1.57; OR arts and sports = 2.34) were more likely to choose negative responses to interpersonal conflicts in the dormitory (all Conclusion: There is significant group heterogeneity in the dormitory interpersonal conflict coping style of Chinese college students. Schools should guide college students to choose appropriate interpersonal conflict resolution strategies to create positive interpersonal relationships in dormitories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.