ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Five-year clinical study of a novel porcine xenograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Positive safety and performance outcomes.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoinductive and Biocompatibility Assessment of a 3D-Printed Polymeric-Hydroxyapatite Composite Interference Screw.Polymers · 2026Article
- Decellularized Porcine Tendon Xenografts Provide a Viable Option in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Cureus · 2026Article
- Low failure rates and satisfactory PROMs in ACL reconstruction with decellularized porcine xenograft: Short-term results in middle-aged adults.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Five-year clinical study of a novel porcine xenograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Positive safety and performance outcomes.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Many graft choices exist for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction including autograft, allograft and, to a lesser extent, synthetic graft, with all having significant limitations. While xenograft can circumvent many of these limitations, potential immunogenic response remains a concern. A novel decellularization process has been developed to remove the principal immunogenic epitopes from porcine digital extensor tendon to produce a nonimmunogenic, biomechanically appropriate ACL xenograft for clinical use. This study reports the first in-human series utilising this xenograft. Methods: This was a 5-year study of 40 patients, mean age 31.9 years (range: 18-48), 70% male, with mean follow-up of 41.9 months (6-60 months) and 19 reaching 5 years. Radiographic and MRI analysis was performed as were a variety of clinical assessments, including arthrometric measurement of anterior tibial translation, Lachman test, Pivot Shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective questionnaire, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. All adverse events were recorded. Clinical outcomes were compared to those reported in the literature for autograft and/or allograft. Results: Adverse events included six graft ruptures which were limited to young males. No evidence of an immunogenic response was noted. Clinical outcome assessments and imaging analysis were in line with those reported in the literature for autograft and/or allograft. Conclusions: This first in-human study of a novel porcine ACL xenograft demonstrated that it is biomechanically and immunologically suitable for clinical use with no safety concerns evident. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.