ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Epigenetic and Structural Brain Aging and Their Associations With Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic dysregulation in depression: molecular mechanisms, clinical biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A growing body of evidence suggests that major depressive disorder (MDD) may be associated with premature biological aging. However, most studies reported to date have examined brain-based (BrainAge) and DNA methylation (DNAm)-based measures (DNAmAge) of biological age (BioAge) in isolation. Methods: We investigated 2 well-studied BioAge measures in lifetime and current MDD: BrainAge and DNAmAge (4 separate DNAmAge measures based on Horvath, Hannum, GrimAge, and PhenoAge clocks). We used cross-sectional cohort data from GS:STRADL (Generation Scotland: STratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally) (BrainAge Results: Individuals with lifetime MDD showed significantly higher BrainAge and DNAmAge in GS, ranging from 1.60 to 2.45 years, than individuals without MDD for all measures except for Horvath age. No differences were found for BrainAge in the UKB. In terms of PAD, lifetime MDD was significantly associated with GrimAge-PAD, PhenoAge-PAD, and Brain-PAD, ranging from odds ratio (OR) = 1.21-1.30 (and in UKB, Brain-PAD OR = 1.05). DNAm-PAD and Brain-PAD demonstrated shared and distinctive associations with lifetime MDD, where PhenoAge-PAD plus Brain-PAD explained maximum variance (area under the curve = 0.69, Conclusions: Our findings highlight shared and distinct associations of premature brain and DNAm aging in lifetime MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.