ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025
Analytical validation of a scrape-free multitarget stool RNA test for colorectal cancer screening.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & aims: Traditional stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests require patients to collect and swab their own stool, which can reduce adherence due to aversion and introduce variability from user error. A novel multitarget stool RNA test (mt-sRNA, ColoSense) eliminates the need for scraping or swabbing stool. Instead, patients merely deposit and ship a sample to the lab. Once recieved, laboratory technologists swab the sample and quantify hemoglobin concentrations using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study evaluates the reliability and reproducibility of this in-laboratory fecal sampling method. Methods: Analytical validation was performed by generating stool pools with known hemoglobin concentrations and exposing pools to various conditions prior to testing with the in-lab FIT. Analytical validation assessed freeze thaw stability, interfering substances, stool input volume, precision, and in-transit stability. Clinical equivalency was also evaluated. Results: All studies met predefined acceptance criteria. The assay demonstrated stability for up to three freeze-thaw cycles. Interference testing with nine dietary substances showed no impact on assay performance. The in-lab FIT maintained accuracy across five different stool input volumes and demonstrated high precision. In-transit stability was confirmed for up to 120 hours, supporting sample robustness during shipping and handling. Clinical equivalency demonstrated in-lab FIT sensitivity of 78 % for CRC and 33 % for advanced adenomas, aligning with previously reported performance of the at-home FIT method. Conclusions: Analytical validation of the in-lab FIT demonstrates the reliability and robustness of this streamlined, single-sample collection method. This improvement could enhance adherence and patient ease-of-use in stool-based CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.