ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025
Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA detection for personalized monitoring of treatment response in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a valuable biomarker in liquid biopsies for monitoring treatment responses in cancer patients. However, detecting ctDNA in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is challenging due to its high heterogeneity and the absence of hotspot driver mutations. Therefore, a personalized approach to ctDNA analysis is essential, tailored to the specific tumor mutations of each EOC patient. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method targeting various genetic alterations in ctDNA identified through a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in EOC tumors. Methods: EOC tumor tissues were sequenced using a targeted NGS panel to identify oncogenic mutations. ddPCR assays were subsequently designed and optimized to detect these tumor-specific mutations in ctDNA. ctDNA levels were monitored and compared with CA-125 for EOC. Results: Fourteen pathogenic mutations, including Conclusion: This study demonstrates the clinical utility of ddPCR for monitoring treatment responses in EOC by targeting patient-specific mutations. Integrating ddPCR with NGS-based mutation identification offers an effective approach for assessing therapeutic outcomes in EOC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.