ReviewInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Comparing virus incubation time in SIRC models: Deterministic versus stochastic approaches.
Review in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamics of a two-patch epidemic model with deterministic/stochastic migration and distributed delays.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time delays are a fundamental feature in modeling stochastic epidemic systems, as they capture the incubation period and other physiological lags inherent in disease transmission. In this work, we investigate a stochastic SIRC (Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered-Cross-immune) epidemic model where the delay is incorporated into the transmission term to reflect the incubation period. To account for environmental variability, we examine two stochastic formulations: the classical approach, which adds independent white noise to each compartment, and a probabilistic, event-driven model in which stochasticity arises directly from transition probabilities. A key focus of our study is the comparison between different delay formulations in the transmission term, specifically contrasting the standard approach-where the delay acts only on the infected compartment-with alternative formulations that distribute the delay across both susceptible and infected populations. Through systematic numerical simulations, we find that the choice of delay formulation strongly influences the timing and magnitude of the initial epidemic peak, while the long-term (asymptotic) behavior is more robust but remains sensitive to the underlying stochastic framework. The probabilistic model, in particular, offers a more faithful depiction of correlated fluctuations and extinction phenomena, capturing the biological complexity of epidemic processes more accurately than the classical approach. These results underscore the importance of both the delay representation and the stochastic modeling strategy in shaping the qualitative and quantitative features of epidemic dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.