ReviewIntegrative medicine research2025
The efficacy and safety of multiple acupuncture therapies in primary insomnia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Review in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "The efficacy and safety of multiple acupuncture therapies in primary insomnia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis".Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
- Response to the letter: "Comment on The efficacy and safety of multiple acupuncture therapies in primary insomnia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis".Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
- Acupotomy at spinal acupoints for primary insomnia: an exploration of therapeutic effectiveness.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture (AT) therapy is an effective treatment for primary insomnia. However, no comprehensive study has compared and evaluated the efficacy and safety of multiple AT therapies and hypnotics. Methods: We searched eight databases from inception to July 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AT treatment for primary insomnia, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technique Journals database. After screening, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score and clinical effectiveness rate were extracted from the included RCTs as outcome measures. We performed network meta-analysis using the Stata and R software. Results: Sixty-four RCTs involving 4443 patients were included in this study. Multiple AT therapies had better efficacy in improving PSQI scores than hypnotics, with AT combined with moxibustion (MOX) and AT combined with auriculotherapy (AU) as the best interventions. Regarding clinical effectiveness, acupoint catgut embedding (ACE) had the greatest potential of being the best intervention, and no serious adverse events related to AT therapies were observed in any of the studies. Conclusion: This review suggests that most AT therapies improve sleep indicators and have good clinical efficacy compared to hypnotics, especially AT combined with AU, AT combined with MOX, and ACE. The safety of AT therapies is reliable; however, the overall quality of the included trials was low, and higher-quality RCTs are required to provide sufficient evidence. Protocol registration: PROSPERO, CRD42017067402.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.