ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025
A field guide for sampling bats (Chiroptera) for eco-epidemiological studies.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bats serve as reservoir hosts for numerous zoonotic pathogens of public health significance, including coronaviruses, lyssaviruses, and henipaviruses, while simultaneously playing critical roles in ecosystem function through pollination, seed dispersal, and pest control. The increasing frequency of bat-associated disease outbreaks has intensified research interest; yet standardized protocols for safe and effective bat sampling remain fragmented. We conducted a systematic review of bat sampling practices and synthesized comprehensive guidelines for capturing, handling, and sampling free-ranging bats for epidemiological surveillance and outbreak investigations. Our framework emphasizes three key elements, including (i) biosecurity measures to prevent pathogen spillover transmission from bats to humans, (ii) biosafety protocols to avoid spillback transmission, and (iii) welfare considerations to minimize the impact on bat populations. Through analysis of published literature and field protocols, we identified significant gaps between recommended and common practices in bat research. We present evidence-based recommendations for capture techniques, specimen collection, sample processing, and storage methods, with particular attention to maintaining sample quality while ensuring safety. Additionally, we provide detailed guidance for field laboratory setup, personnel training requirements, and emergency response procedures. The implementation of these standardized protocols will enhance the quality and compatibility of bat research data while protecting both human and bat health. This guide serves as a foundation for safe, ethical, and effective investigation of bat-borne pathogen epidemiology and ecology, particularly in resource-limited settings where disease emergence risks are often highest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.