ArticleACS food science & technology2025
Engineering Pectin Biobased Films with Bacterial Cellulose Nanostructures for Enhanced Food Packaging Performance.
Article in ACS food science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Paradigm for Sustainable Food Packaging: Construction, Properties, and Applications of Multifunctional Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From waste to functional materials: preparation, modification, properties, and application of plant by-product polysaccharide-based biodegradable films in the field of food packaging.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Integrated Zero By-Product Valorization of Orange Peel into Multifunctional Pectocellulosic-ZnO Nanocomposite Films for Sustainable Packaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed pectin-based (Pec) films reinforced with microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) and bacterial cellulose nanostructures (BNC) produced via acid (BNC-A) or enzymatic (BNC-E) processing for sustainable food packaging. Sugar beet pulp served as a renewable resource for bacterial cellulose production (3.9 g/L) and food-grade pectin (galacturonic acid = 76.9%). Transparency and optical properties of films were influenced by BNCs incorporation (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.