ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Early medical care and trauma management in mass casualties from major explosive accidents: a retrospective analysis and recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of mass casualties resulting from major explosive accidents and to identify the shortcomings in the management of such casualties during sudden explosive events. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from a gas explosion at a cafeteria in a district of Southwest China. Key treatment measures, including injury assessments, early triage, timing of surgeries, hospital stay duration, and complications, were systematically collected and analyzed. Results: The explosion resulted in 16 fatalities at the scene and 10 survivors, all of whom received prompt triage, classification, transportation, and effective treatment. Among the survivors, two were male and eight were female, aged 26-50 years, with an average age of 39 years. The on-site mortality rate was 61.5%. Among the survivors, one patient with severe traumatic brain injury died 11 days post-incident despite medical intervention, while another was rehospitalized due to the recurrence of a pre-existing chronic condition. Three patients experienced varying degrees of hearing loss upon discharge, with one also reporting intermittent tinnitus. Four patients showed improvement and were discharged. Conclusion: The on-site mortality rate in mass casualties from major explosions is extremely high, and the injuries are often complex. Current early triage methods are limited and overly simplistic. The incidence of pulmonary injuries is high in explosive accidents, with rapid disease progression and elevated mortality. Timely identification of blast injuries and continuous monitoring of injury progression are critical to preventing further exacerbation of traumatic brain injuries and other organ damage. Strengthening regional trauma care infrastructure is essential for reducing preventable deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.