ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
Let's ask the patient: disease prediction based on patients' symptom descriptions in free text.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the value self-reported free-text symptom descriptions for supporting diagnostic decisions in osteoarthritis (OA), fibromyalgia (FM) and immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (imRD) using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). Methods: Free-text descriptions from 8454 patients were processed using a word-weighting method (TF-IDF vectorization) that reflects how relevant each word is across the dataset, and then classified with support vector machine (SVM) models. OA and FM models were optimized for specificity and the imRD model for sensitivity based on disease context and validated against an independent dataset. Model explainability was explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: The SVM models demonstrated moderate diagnostic support potential with Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) values of 0.68 for OA, 0.75 for FM and 0.69 for imRD. When optimized for clinical utility, the models achieved high specificity of 0.82 for OA and 0.92 for FM, effectively reducing unnecessary referrals with misdiagnosis rates of only 17% and 8%, respectively. For imRD, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.77, ensuring minimal missed diagnoses of these potentially serious conditions. Decision curve analysis confirmed clinical utility across varying threshold preferences. SHAP analysis revealed that key linguistic patterns in patient descriptions aligned with clinical reasoning, enhancing the models' interpretability. Conclusion: Our results highlight the value of patient-reported data in augmenting rheumatology decision-making and sets the stage for further development in AI-assisted diagnostics. While not a standalone diagnostic tool, the integration of NLP-driven analysis of free-text symptom descriptions shows promise in reducing diagnostic ambiguity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.