ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Restorative Community Building Practices: A Train-the-Trainer Workshop for Medical Students, Staff, and Faculty.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Restorative practices (RPs) are part of an emerging field that examines ways to build, strengthen, and manage relationships in organizations and communities, an approach that is gaining traction in the medical field. We describe the design and implementation of a day-long training for RPs focused on community-building at an academic medical institution that can be adapted at institutions interested in establishing a core of practitioners. Methods: We developed a day-long workshop to teach community-building practices to medical and physician assistant students, residents, staff, and faculty. The workshop included lectures, interactive activities, and group discussions. Participants completed pre- and postworkshop surveys and a 3-month follow-up survey to assess their understanding and application of RPs. Quantitative data were analyzed using a two-sample Results: The workshop had 25 attendees, with 92% and 88% response rates for pre- and postworkshop surveys, respectively. Participants reported significant improvements in their ability to define RPs, describe their applications, and design RP activities (all Discussion: The workshop effectively developed RP capacity among participants, with positive indicators of sustained confidence in acquired skills. Limitations include the lack of longitudinal training for ongoing skill development and regular practice. Future work should explore longitudinal training models, advanced RP applications, and long-term follow-up to assess efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.