ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
High-precision intraoperative diagnosis of gliomas: integrating imaging and intraoperative flow cytometry with machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate intraoperative identification of glioma molecular subtypes, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion, is essential for precise diagnosis, prognostication, and determining the extent of tumor resection-balancing maximal tumor removal with preservation of neurological function. Methods: We developed a machine learning model that integrates preoperative imaging features [magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and Results: Analyzing 288 cases of diffuse gliomas, this model achieved an overall accuracy of 76.0%, with a macro-average ROC-AUC of 0.88 and a micro-average ROC-AUC of 0.89. Key predictive factors included the tumor-to-normal uptake ratio on PET, malignancy index from iFC, and patient age, all of which showed significant differences between correctly and incorrectly classified cases. We also developed a prototype application that visualizes the prediction results intraoperatively, thereby supporting real-time surgical decision-making. Conclusion: This integrated approach enhances the precision of intraoperative molecular diagnosis and has the potential to optimize surgical strategies for glioma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.