ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Deep learning-based prediction of cerebral white matter hyperintensity burden using carotid magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Carotid Artery Anatomy and Geometry and White Matter Hyperintensities and Accompanying Comorbid Factors.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are key neuroimaging markers of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), associated with cognitive decline and increased stroke risk. We aimed to investigate whether carotid time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), a routinely acquired and non-invasive vascular imaging modality, can be utilized to independently predict WMH burden using deep learning. Methods: We developed a deep learning-based framework to predict WMH presence and severity using only 3D carotid TOF MRA. Two classification tasks were defined: binary (grade 0 vs. grades 1-3) and three-class (grade 0, 1, 2-3) classification. Four model architectures- simple fully convolutional network (SFCN), ResNet10, MedicalNet, and Medical Slice Transformer-were evaluated. To enhance model interpretability, we performed saliency mapping and occlusion analysis. Results: SFCN performed the best, achieving an accuracy of 76.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.874 in binary classification, along with a 63.5% accuracy and a 0.827 AUC in WMH severity classification. Interpretability analyses confirmed that models predominantly focused on carotid vessel regions, which supports known vascular associations with WMH burden. Conclusion: Carotid TOF MRA alone can serve as a predictive marker for WMH burden when analyzed using deep learning. This approach highlights the potential utility of extracranial carotid imaging as a non-invasive surrogate for early and accessible assessment of cerebrovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.