ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Safety and Effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an established treatment for mild to moderate allergic asthma. However, limited data are available regarding its safety and efficacy in patients with severe asthma. This study aimed to gather real-world evidence (RWE) on the safety and effectiveness of AIT in individuals with severe asthma caused by sensitization to at least 1 allergen, who were either currently undergoing AIT or had received it within the past five years. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Spain, including patients aged ≥6 years with severe asthma (Spanish Guideline for Asthma Management [GEMA] steps 5-6 and Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] step 5) sensitized to at least 1 allergen who had received AIT within the previous 5 years, to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Results: The study included 93 patients (54.8% female) with a median age of 40.3 years, including 5 under 14. A total of 16 systemic reactions (SRs) were reported in 8 patients (8.6%), mostly immediate (13/16) and occurring during the initiation phase (12/16), all in patients receiving subcutaneous immunotherapy. Most SRs were mild to moderate, except for 2 severe reactions in 1 patient. Only 3 patients discontinued treatment. Significant improvements in both FeNO and FEV Conclusion: This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of AIT in patients with well-controlled severe asthma in routine clinical practice. Additional prospective real-world studies are needed to better understand the efficacy of AIT in severe asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.