Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994691›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Work impairment in bipolar disorder compared to the healthy population: a systematic review.

Régio Marcos Abreu Filho, Caroline Haussman Dos Santos, Alberto José Filgueiras Gonçalves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Régio Marcos Abreu FilhoMedicina, Faculdade Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-6654-0787
Caroline Haussman Dos SantosPsicologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-7941
Alberto José Filgueiras GonçalvesPsicologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-0606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is a chronic condition that has been insufficiently explored in terms of its predictors of work impairment and its long-term impact on employment. This study aims to compare work impairment in individuals with bipolar disorder to that of a healthy population. A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted by using PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, and PsycINFO databases. Search terms used were: ("bipolar") and ("work" or "occupational"), with a publication date restriction from 2013 to 2023. A total of 20 articles were selected. All included assessments of employability and work performance using work-specific scales or scales containing work-related items. Most studies showed that a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, along with its long-term effects on behavior, neurocognition, emotional regulation, decision-making, sustained attention, volition, and interpretation of interpersonal events, significantly increases susceptibility to unemployment and dependence on government assistance. Even during periods of clinical stability, maintaining employment at levels comparable to healthy individuals remains highly challenging. Furthermore, the impact of bipolar disorder on employment outcomes appears to be distinct from that of major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. Clinical studies consistently indicate that bipolar disorder severely compromises both employability and work performance. However, few effective interventions for improving employability and productivity in this population are currently available.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderpsychiatrysystematic reviewwork

Identifiers

PMID40994691
PMCPMC12456419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.