Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994676›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Recent advances in gradient biomimetic scaffolds for tendon-bone interface regeneration.

Xianyan Xie, Yu Wang, Ziyan Li, Gaoyuan Yang, Guodong Cheng, Shuqi Qin, Huiguo Wang, Lin Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. 3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xianyan XieCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu WangCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyan LiCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Gaoyuan YangCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Guodong ChengCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuqi QinCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Huiguo WangCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ZhuCollege of Sport and Health, GuangZhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury and repair of the tendon-bone interface (TBI) pose a significant challenge in the fields of orthopedics and sports medicine. Due to the gradients in structure, composition, mechanical properties, and biological signals across the TBI, transitioning from flexible tendon to rigid bone, traditional surgical approaches often struggle to reconstruct its functional structure, leading to poor mechanical properties of the interface after repair and high re-tear rates. In contrast, gradient biomimetic scaffolds, by mimicking the continuous gradients of native TBI, offer an effective solution for achieving functional TBI regeneration. This review systematically summarizes the research progress of gradient biomimetic scaffolds for TBI regeneration in recent years. Firstly, we discuss the fine structure, physiological functions of native TBI, and the repair challenges faced after its injury, emphasizing the necessity of reconstructing gradient structures. Subsequently, it focuses on the design principles and core biomimetic strategies of gradient biomimetic scaffolds, discussing in depth the principles of construction and implementation strategies for physical structure gradients (e.g., porosity, fiber orientation, mechanical modulus), chemical composition gradients (e.g., degree of mineralization, polymer/ECM components), and biological signal gradients (e.g., growth factors, genes). Building upon this, this review comprehensively reviews various biomaterials for gradient scaffold construction, including natural polymers (collagen, silk fibroin, chitosan, etc.), synthetic polymers (PCL, PLGA, PU, etc.), and inorganic bioactive materials (calcium phosphate ceramics, bioactive glass), analyzing their characteristics, functionalization methods, and applications in gradient construction. Furthermore, this review also systematically summarizes and compares major fabrication techniques for gradient biomimetic scaffolds, particularly the advantages and limitations of electrospinning and additive manufacturing (3D printing) in constructing specific gradient features, and highlights emerging techniques such as microfluidics. Finally, building upon the summarized existing research findings, this review critically analyzes the key challenges and technical bottlenecks currently facing gradient biomimetic scaffolds regarding structural biomimetic accuracy, spatio-temporal control of biological functions, vascularization, and immunocompatibility, and offers perspectives on future research directions, such as smart scaffolds, integration of multiple gradients, personalized manufacturing, and clinical translation strategies.

Indexed as

advanced fabrication techniquesgradient biomimetic scaffoldtendon-bone interface regenerationtissue engineeringtranslational regenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID40994676
PMCPMC12454330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.