Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994649›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in China.

Yuan Feng, Yu Shu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuan FengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Eighth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China.
Yu ShuDepartment of Oncology, The Eighth Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate fruquintinib's efficacy and safety in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Methods: Studies assessing fruquintinib for colorectal cancer were included. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse reactions. A random-effects model was employed, and sensitivity analysis assessed the stability of the results and potential heterogeneity. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.0 were used for analysis. Results: Eleven studies with 2,367 patients were included. Fruquintinib significantly improved OS (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.81; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.64; P < 0.0001). No significant increase in adverse events, serious adverse events, fatigue, or hypertension. However, sensitivity analysis suggested that the risk of hypertension might be unstable, requiring further validation. Conclusion: Fruquintinib improves OS and PFS in colorectal cancer patients without elevating the risk of overall or serious adverse events; however, its potential impact on hypertension risk requires further investigation. Due to limitations such as small sample size, missing data, and regional bias, larger, multicenter, double-blind RCTs are needed to validate these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD420251002004.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerfruquintinibmeta-analysisoverall survivalprogression-free survivalsafety

Identifiers

PMID40994649
PMCPMC12454978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.