ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Predictive analysis of dry eye diagnosis and digital screen usage: a cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Acute tear-film disruption in treatment-naive acute anterior uveitis: A retrospective case-control study.Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo characterize the ocular surface characteristics in the Nepalese population across all age groups who have used digital screens for extended durations over several years.
methodsIn a cross-sectional, observational study, 144 digital screen users were assessed for dry eye disease (DED) using subjective and objective measures. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire evaluated symptoms, followed by clinical assessments, including slit lamp biomicroscopy, tear breakup time (TBUT), Oxford Scheme grading, and Schirmer I test. DED was diagnosed if a patient had an OSDI score over 13 and at least two clinical signs (OSDI, Schirmer I test, or ocular staining). The prevalence of DED was calculated based on the proportion of patients meeting these criteria.
resultsOf the 144 participants (mean age: 34.6±15.2y), 78 (54.2%) were female. The use of digital screens varied between 2-8h (mean duration: 4.1±2.7h) per day. The mean OSDI score, TBUT score, and the Schirmer I scores were 22.7±10.5 (max-min: 24.4-20.9), 6.8±4.2s (max-min: 7.5-6.1), and 12.3±4.6 mm (max-min: 13.1-11.5) respectively with 95% confidence interval (
conclusionThere is a significant association between prolonged use of digital screens and clinical markers of dry eye signs and symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.