ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Mammography Based Nomogram Integrating Radiomics and Clinical Features to Predict Benign or Malignant Regression of BI-RADS 4A Lesions at Follow-Up.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to develop a nomogram based on mammography radiomic and clinical features to predict the benign and malignant progression of BI-RADS 4a lesions under follow-up. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included 104 patients with over six months of follow-up, consisting of 56 malignant and 48 benign cases, totaling 202 images. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. In total, 1316 radiomic features were extracted using AK3.30 software including morphological, first-order statistics and texture features. Spearman correlation analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method were performed for feature selection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors among clinical features and construct a radiomic-clinical fusion nomogram. The performance of radiomics model and radiomic-clinical fusion model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. DeLong test was employed to compare the efficacy between the two models. Results: Four radiomic features were selected, combined with two clinical features (positive clinical palpation and history of breast surgery). The AUC values for the radiomics model and radiomic-clinical fusion model in the training and testing groups were 0.858 and 0.860, and 0.923 and 0.904, respectively. The DeLong test showed no significant difference between the two models with a Conclusion: The nomogram based on mammography radiomics and clinical features demonstrated good performance in predicting the benign and malignant progression of BI-RADS 4a lesions under follow-up, showing potential for risk stratification of BI-RADS 4a lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.