Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994524›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Assessing the role of FET-PET imaging in glioblastoma recurrence: A retrospective analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Lisa S Hönikl, Claire Delbridge, Igor Yakushev, Chiara Negwer, Denise Bernhardt, Friederike Schmidt-Graf, Bernhard Meyer, Arthur Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa S HöniklDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Claire DelbridgeDepartment of Neuropathology, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Igor YakushevDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Chiara NegwerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiotherapy, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Friederike Schmidt-GrafDepartment of Neurology, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.
Arthur WagnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with a high recurrence rate. Differentiating tumor progression from treatment-induced changes remains a diagnostic challenge. Research question: Can FET-PET reliably distinguish true GBM recurrence from post-therapeutic effects across multiple recurrence stages, and how does MGMT promoter methylation influence diagnostic accuracy? Material and methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study correlating PET findings with histopathological results from surgery or biopsy at first, second, and third recurrence. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using three interpretive scenarios for uncertain PET results. Subgroup analysis based on MGMT methylation was also performed. Results: 960 patients with GBM were treated at our department between 2006 and 2021, of whom 347 (36.1 %) had one tumor recurrence during follow-up with 156 (45.0 %) FET-PET scans available. 95 patients (9.9 %) had a second recurrence with a FET-PET conducted in 37 of these (39.0 %), whereas 23 patients (2.4 %) had a third recurrence with a FET-PET available in 8 patients (34.8 %). Sensitivity was 95 % at first recurrence, 96 % at second, and 83 % at third. Specificity was low overall (13 %, 0 %, 0 %). No statistically robust differences in diagnostic performance were observed between MGMT subgroups (p > 0.4 for all). Discussion and conclusion: PET imaging demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting GBM recurrence but showed variable specificity. Notably, sensitivity declined with an increasing number of recurrences, suggesting that cumulative treatment effects and greater tumor heterogeneity over time may affect diagnostic performance. Further prospective studies are needed to refine diagnostic thresholds and improve clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

FET-PET imagingGBM recurrenceSpecificity and sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40994524
PMCPMC12454899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.