ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
The use of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: Attitudes and ethical concerns of anesthesiologists.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in onco-anaesthesia: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- From prediction to practice: closing the translation gap in artificial intelligence for anesthesia.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Existing studies on anesthesiologists' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) leave a global understanding underexplored. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate Turkish anesthesiologists' attitudes toward AI, examining its perceived benefits, limitations, and associated ethical concerns. Insights from this study aim to enhance understanding of AI's role in anesthesiology within a cultural and ethical context. Methods: This nationwide study surveyed Turkish anesthesiologists. Descriptive statistics summarized categorical variables, Pearson's Chi-square test compared variables between groups. Binary logistic regression analyzed associations between demographic factors and positive attitudes toward AI. Results: Among 293 valid responses, 69.6% of participants expressed positive attitudes toward AI. Gender ( Conclusions: Turkish anesthesiologists exhibited predominantly positive attitudes toward AI, with prior experience playing a significant role in shaping perceptions. While AI was embraced for academic, educational, and noninvasive tasks, skepticism was present toward its application in invasive procedures. These findings highlight AI's potential to enhance efficiency and patient safety while underscoring the need for comprehensive legal and ethical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.