ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Mass gathering emergency medicine during the first international football event with anti-COVID-19 measures: An Italian experience.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the number and type of acute pathological events during each football match and analyze whether the stadium's health protocol, which includes anti-COVID-19 measures, has had an impact on reducing admissions to nearby hospitals. The number of spectators requiring assistance was evaluated through the patient presentation rate (PPR), and the number of hospitalizations was assessed through the hospital transport rate (TTHR). Methods: General and specific measures aimed at reducing the risk of COVID-19 transmission were implemented for spectators attending the 2020 UEFA European Football Championship matches held in Rome. For planning and risk stratification of events, the Arbon and Maurer scores were calculated to define the expected resources and the impact on healthcare systems. The primary outcome was the PPR and relative triage grouped into four categories. The secondary outcome was the need for hospitalization and the relative TTHR. The Mann-Whitney Results: The most frequent symptoms were headache (23.9%), confusion (23.9%), syncope (11.4%), and dizziness (5.7%). The PPR ranged from 0.84 to 1.15. The most frequently assigned code was white in all events examined. The TTHR was between 0 and 0.21. Conclusion: The assistance service provided at EURO 2020 successfully fulfilled its primary role of minimizing referrals to nearby hospitals. Mass gathering events can be conducted safely if adequate precautionary measures against COVID-19 are implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.