ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Infantile postoperative residual curarization (IPORC) - A prospective observational study.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB), defined as a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) <0.90, is a complication of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). Data about RNMB in children are rare. This single-center observational trial evaluated the rate of neuromuscular monitoring (NMM), the incidence, and consequences of RNMB in pediatrics. Methods: Children over 1 month undergoing elective and urgent surgery during core work hours receiving NMBA were included in an 84-day observation period. When the anesthesiologist decided to extubate, a blinded investigator measured the TOFR by acceleromyography. Data on demographics, surgery, anesthesia, and outcome were recorded. Comparison of qualitative variables was done using the chi-square test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare quantitative variables between patients with or without TOFR <0.90. Results: Eighty-nine children were included in the analysis. Rate of quantitative and qualitative NMM was 65.2% and 5.6%, respectively. Incidence of RNMB was 10.1% with TOFRs between 0.78 and 0.89 in 8 children and a TOFR of 0.48 in one child. Median time from the last NMBA administration to the TOFR before extubation was significantly shorter in patients with a TOFR <0.90 in comparison with a TOFR ≥0.90 (88 vs. 110 min). In the RNMB group, qualitative NMM was significantly more often used compared with the no RNMB group (22.2% vs. 3.8%). Adverse events were rare with no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: RNMB in children is a relevant hazard. Qualitative NMM is not reliable to exclude RNMB. Institutional training programs on neuromuscular management in children may be helpful to improve the rate of quantitative NMM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.