ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Habits and attitudes of smartphone use among anesthesiologists during anesthetized patient care: A survey-based study in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of the Relationship Between Health Professionals' Managerial Attitudes and Distractions in the Operating Room: A Mixed Design Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare providers use smartphones for various beneficial purposes, including education, communication, and remote patient monitoring. However, concerns have arisen about their potential to distract anesthesiologists in the operating room, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences. This study aimed to assess smartphone habits and attitudes among anesthesiologists at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Anesthesiologists were surveyed using a questionnaire distributed via email and phone numbers. Hard copies of the questionnaire were also distributed in the operating rooms. Data are cleaned in Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0. Results: Our study included 123 participants, mostly male (n = 102, 82.9%), with a significant portion aged 31-40 years (n = 34, 27.6%). Most were consultants (n = 51, 41.5%), and 64.2% (n = 79) spent less than 25% of their working hours on smartphones. Despite 52.8% (n = 65) reporting distractions from smartphone use, only 29.3% (n = 36) supported restrictions in operating theaters. A significant association was found between age and perceptions of smartphone impact on patient care ( Conclusion: Our study highlights the pervasive use of smartphones among anesthesiologists, with many acknowledging both benefits and distractions. While a significant number perceive positive impacts on patient care, concerns about distraction remain, indicating the need for balanced guidelines in operating theaters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.