Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994493›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Habits and attitudes of smartphone use among anesthesiologists during anesthetized patient care: A survey-based study in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

Rand A Alshaya, Mohammed K Alharbi, Bader Albabtain, Abdulrahman Almalik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rand A AlshayaDepartment of Anaesthesia, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed K AlharbiDepartment of Anaesthesia, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bader AlbabtainDepartment of Anaesthesia, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlmalikDepartment of Anaesthesia, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers use smartphones for various beneficial purposes, including education, communication, and remote patient monitoring. However, concerns have arisen about their potential to distract anesthesiologists in the operating room, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences. This study aimed to assess smartphone habits and attitudes among anesthesiologists at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Anesthesiologists were surveyed using a questionnaire distributed via email and phone numbers. Hard copies of the questionnaire were also distributed in the operating rooms. Data are cleaned in Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0. Results: Our study included 123 participants, mostly male (n = 102, 82.9%), with a significant portion aged 31-40 years (n = 34, 27.6%). Most were consultants (n = 51, 41.5%), and 64.2% (n = 79) spent less than 25% of their working hours on smartphones. Despite 52.8% (n = 65) reporting distractions from smartphone use, only 29.3% (n = 36) supported restrictions in operating theaters. A significant association was found between age and perceptions of smartphone impact on patient care ( Conclusion: Our study highlights the pervasive use of smartphones among anesthesiologists, with many acknowledging both benefits and distractions. While a significant number perceive positive impacts on patient care, concerns about distraction remain, indicating the need for balanced guidelines in operating theaters.

Indexed as

Anesthesiologistspatient caresmartphonessurvey-based study

Identifiers

PMID40994493
PMCPMC12456643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.