Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994459›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Assessment of a painful shoulder arthroplasty.

S Burns, S Waseem, T Thangarajah, S Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BurnsDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, Euston Road, London, United Kingdom.
S WaseemDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, Euston Road, London, United Kingdom.
T ThangarajahDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, Euston Road, London, United Kingdom.
S LambertDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, Euston Road, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of a painful shoulder replacement benefits from a systematic approach to determine the underlying cause(s) and appropriate management strategies. This review provides an overview of the assessment, investigation and management of the painful shoulder replacement using a superficial to deep methodical analysis based on the anatomy of the shoulder. The intersection of pathoanatomy, pathobiomechanics and symptoms is explored in terms of the common causes of pain. Common causes of pain including conditions characterised by contractures, weakness, instability, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, neurological injury, and metal hypersensitivity are discussed. Prosthesis-specific complications for hemiarthroplasty, anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are briefly discussed.

Indexed as

AssessmentComplicationImagingInfectionManagementPainShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40994459
PMCPMC12455063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.