ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Assessment of clinical pharmacology and competence during medicine clerkships.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using assessment in pharmacology to drive learning in the right direction.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safe and effective prescribing is a competency recognized in frameworks created by various countries for medical students entering clinical practice. Clinical pharmacology education, when aligned with competency-based medical education (CBME), offers an opportunity to improve pharmacotherapeutic decision-making and medication safety. This narrative review summarizes the current assessment methods used to evaluate clinical pharmacology competencies of undergraduate medical students during clerkships, including objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs), mini-clinical evaluation exercises (mini-CEX), case-based discussions, and written and oral exams. While these assessments are commonly used, their application to evaluate competencies related to clinical pharmacology is limited. The review illustrates the need for a structured, multimodal approach to assessment that emphasizes frequent formative feedback in a longitudinal manner, observable behaviours or tasks, and the implementation of online educational resources developed to target these competencies. Developing and aligning clinical pharmacology assessments with clear, specified competencies during clinical clerkships can potentially promote learner confidence, knowledge and skills necessary to optimize patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.