ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Martini 3 Limitations in Phospholipid Flip-Flop.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Martini 3 as a Transferable Force Field for Lipopolysaccharide Parametrization.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Mechanism of Phosphatidylserine Lipid Scrambling by Human SERINC3, an HIV-1 Restriction Factor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phospholipid membranes serve as essential barriers in biological systems, and protein-mediated lipid flip-flop is a crucial process for lipid homeostasis in membranes, which is vital for various cellular functions. These phenomena can be studied using the Martini coarse-grained force field, a valuable tool for membrane simulations that balances computational efficiency with chemical accuracy while capturing key membrane properties. However, the accuracy of the newer Martini 3 force field in describing energetics of phospholipid flip-flop remains unknown. Here, we show dramatic differences in the free energy barriers of lipid flip-flop when simulated with Martini 3, Martini 2.2, and CHARMM36m force fields. Using umbrella sampling simulations of six phospholipids (POPC, DPPA, POPE, POPG, POPS, and DPTAP) in the POPC membrane, we demonstrate that Martini 3 predicts significantly lower flip-flop barriers compared to all-atom simulations and the older Martini 2.2 version, with particularly severe underestimation for the positively charged lipid (DPTAP). For DPTAP, we identified that altered Lennard-Jones parameters between choline and alkyl tail beads likely contribute to this discrepancy, as evidenced by our systematic parameter testing. These findings highlight limitations in the current Martini 3 parametrization that should be considered when studying processes involving molecular transport across membranes and suggest potential refinements to improve the model's accuracy for such phenomena. To complete the picture, we also discuss the energetics of flip-flops of phospholipids with various lipid tail lengths (DLPC, DMPC, DPPC, DSPC) and lipid tail saturation (DOPC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.