Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994261›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

A computer vision model for automated kidney stone segmentation and evaluation of its performance vs surgeons.

Daiwei Lu, Ekamjit S Deol, Tatsuki Koyama, Ipek Oguz, Nicholas L Kavoussi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daiwei LuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ekamjit S DeolSaint Louis University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tatsuki KoyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ipek OguzSaint Louis University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nicholas L KavoussiDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-0412

Funding

A Navigational System for Endoscopic Kidney Stone SurgeryR21DK133742 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAVOUSSI, NICHOLAS L, OGUZ, IPEK · 2023 to 2024
$452k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK133742NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a computer vision model that segments stones to improve visualisation during ureteroscopy (URS) and to compare model performance to that of experts. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected 136 videos of URS for intrarenal kidney stone treatment. Frames were extracted at 3 frames per second (FPS) and manually annotated. The video dataset was split into training (75%), validation (5%) and testing (20%) subsets. Model performance was evaluated for stone localisation, laser ablation, and final evaluation of remaining fragments based on area under the receiver-operating curve, binary cross-entropy loss and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Model performance was compared to the manual annotations of five board-certified urologists through pairwise comparison of frame-by-frame segmentation accuracy.

resultsThe final dataset consisted of 21 718 frames from 38 fibreoptic and 98 digital videos. Overall, the model showed excellent performance: DSC 0.97 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.91, 0.99) and could segment at 30 FPS. Performance was similar for both fibreoptic (0.97 [IQR 0.91, 0.99]) and digital scopes (0.97 [IQR 0.92, 0.99]). Additionally, the model demonstrated good performance during stone localisation (0.98 [IQR 0.93, 0.99]) and stone laser ablation (0.96 [IQR 0.89, 0.97]), with slightly worse performance during evaluation of residual fragments (0.91 [IQR 0.50, 0.97]). Model performance was comparable to the five expert surgeons overall. In a head-to-head comparison, the model significantly outperformed three of the five experts and performed similarly to the other two.

conclusionThe computer vision model demonstrates good performance for task-specific stone segmentation evaluation during URS. The segmentation performance of the model was similar to the segmentation performance of expert surgeons, demonstrating the feasibility of its real-time intra-operative utilisation.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreteroscopyClinical CompetenceHumansVideo Recordingartificial intelligencecomputer‐assisted Surgerycomputer visionkidney stone diseasemachine learningsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40994261
PMCPMC12690337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.