Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994247›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2025

A novel audiogram model for predicting the prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Hsia-Wei Tseng, Chien-Yeh Hsu, Chih-Hao Chen, Yuan-Chia Chu, Wen-Huei Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Audiogram Configuration Predicts Treatment Response in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI Classification of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Its Clinical Correlates.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hsia-Wei TsengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chien-Yeh HsuDepartment of Information Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chih-Hao ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kaohsiung Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Yuan-Chia ChuDepartment of Information Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Wen-Huei LiaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0001-7852-4654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency involving hearing loss greater than 30 dB across three consecutive frequencies within 72 hours. Prognosis is influenced by the initial pure-tone audiogram (PTA), with ascending and U-shaped patterns showing better outcomes and descending patterns linked to poorer outcomes. Traditional audiograms are classified into four to seven types based on hearing thresholds at four to six frequencies, such as flat, ascending, or descending types. However, the definitions of these patterns are often ambiguous and not easy to apply in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of the traditional seven-type audiogram model with a novel three-type audiogram model.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included SSNHL patients from 2012 to 2023. Hearing outcomes, measured by PTA, were classified using both the traditional seven-type audiogram model and a new three-type model based on the 4 kHz threshold (the best, intermediate, the worst). The traditional seven-type model classifies audiograms into flat, descending, ascending, tent-shaped, U-shaped, jagged, and profound types based on the threshold patterns at four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz). The novel three-type model classified audiograms according to the relative position of the 4 kHz threshold: (1) 4 kHz the best (lowest threshold), (2) 4 kHz intermediate (threshold in between), or (3) 4 kHz the worst (highest threshold). Complete recovery (CR) was defined as a final hearing threshold ≤25 dB HL. Multiple and stratified linear regression analyses assessed its association with the CR rate, defined as the proportion of patients achieving CR.

resultsIn total, 965 patients with SSNHL were recruited (51.5% men; mean age 50.8 ± 15.1 years). Left ear involvement was more common (53.3%). CR was achieved in 21.1% of patients. The three-type audiogram model classification was significantly associated with CR (overall p < 0.001, multivariable logistic regression). 4 kHz was the worst, the CR rate was 20%, intermediate, 36%, the best, 49%. In contrast, the traditional seven-type audiogram model did not demonstrate such predictive characteristics.

conclusionThe novel three-type audiogram model provides better prognostic predictions for SSNHL, with 4 kHz frequency being a key factor influencing recovery. Traditional audiogram classification is relatively complex, whereas the novel three-type audiogram model, which uses the 4 kHz threshold for classification, is simple, clear, and provides better prognostic prediction for SSNHL, making it more suitable for clinical application.

Indexed as

Audiometry, Pure-ToneHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Loss, SuddenAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies4 kHz thresholdAudiogram modelComplete recoverySudden sensorineural hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID40994247
PMCPMC12718722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.