ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2025
A novel audiogram model for predicting the prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Audiogram Configuration Predicts Treatment Response in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Serum sCD163 indicates disease severity and prognosis in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI Classification of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Its Clinical Correlates.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency involving hearing loss greater than 30 dB across three consecutive frequencies within 72 hours. Prognosis is influenced by the initial pure-tone audiogram (PTA), with ascending and U-shaped patterns showing better outcomes and descending patterns linked to poorer outcomes. Traditional audiograms are classified into four to seven types based on hearing thresholds at four to six frequencies, such as flat, ascending, or descending types. However, the definitions of these patterns are often ambiguous and not easy to apply in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of the traditional seven-type audiogram model with a novel three-type audiogram model.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included SSNHL patients from 2012 to 2023. Hearing outcomes, measured by PTA, were classified using both the traditional seven-type audiogram model and a new three-type model based on the 4 kHz threshold (the best, intermediate, the worst). The traditional seven-type model classifies audiograms into flat, descending, ascending, tent-shaped, U-shaped, jagged, and profound types based on the threshold patterns at four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz). The novel three-type model classified audiograms according to the relative position of the 4 kHz threshold: (1) 4 kHz the best (lowest threshold), (2) 4 kHz intermediate (threshold in between), or (3) 4 kHz the worst (highest threshold). Complete recovery (CR) was defined as a final hearing threshold ≤25 dB HL. Multiple and stratified linear regression analyses assessed its association with the CR rate, defined as the proportion of patients achieving CR.
resultsIn total, 965 patients with SSNHL were recruited (51.5% men; mean age 50.8 ± 15.1 years). Left ear involvement was more common (53.3%). CR was achieved in 21.1% of patients. The three-type audiogram model classification was significantly associated with CR (overall p < 0.001, multivariable logistic regression). 4 kHz was the worst, the CR rate was 20%, intermediate, 36%, the best, 49%. In contrast, the traditional seven-type audiogram model did not demonstrate such predictive characteristics.
conclusionThe novel three-type audiogram model provides better prognostic predictions for SSNHL, with 4 kHz frequency being a key factor influencing recovery. Traditional audiogram classification is relatively complex, whereas the novel three-type audiogram model, which uses the 4 kHz threshold for classification, is simple, clear, and provides better prognostic prediction for SSNHL, making it more suitable for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.