ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025
Learning latent hardening: enhancing deep learning with domain knowledge for material inverse problems.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning latent hardening: enhancing deep learning with domain knowledge for material inverse problems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) have improved the ability to model complex, nonlinear relationships, such as those encountered in complex material inverse problems. However, the effectiveness of these methods often depends on large datasets, which are not always available. In this study, the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge of the mechanical behaviour of material microstructures is investigated to evaluate the effect on the predictive performance of the models in data-scarce scenarios. To overcome data limitations, a two-step framework, learning latent hardening (LLH), is proposed. In the first step of LLH, a deep neural network (DNN) is employed to reconstruct full stress-strain curves from randomly selected portions of the stress-strain curves to capture the latent mechanical response of a material based on key microstructural features. In the second step of LLH, the results of the reconstructed stress-strain curves are leveraged to predict key microstructural features of porous materials. The performance of six DL and/or ML models trained with and without domain knowledge are compared: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), DNN, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and random forest (RF). The results from the models with domain-specific information consistently achieved higher [Formula: see text] values compared to models without prior knowledge. When the models did not include domain knowledge, meaningful patterns in the model result, such as the link between stress-strain behaviour and underlying microstructural changes not being recognized, while those enhanced with domain knowledge insights showed better feature selection, in which they identified key stress-strain characteristics that are most relevant for predicting microstructure. These findings reveal the critical role domain-specific knowledge can provide in guiding DL models, further highlighting the need to combine domain expertise with data-driven approaches to achieve reliable and accurate outcomes in materials science and related fields.This article is part of the theme issue 'Frontiers of applied inverse problems in science and engineering'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.