Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994176›Full record

ArticleJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Computer-Simulated Model Examining the Effects of Convexity Characteristics at the Skin Barrier- Abdomen Interface.

Jack Bradley-Clarke, Jennifer Evans, Jonathan Waller, Katie McGill, Clifford Long, Tod Brindle, Neal Carty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jack Bradley-ClarkeJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Jennifer EvansJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Jonathan WallerJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Katie McGillJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Clifford LongJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Tod BrindleJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.
Neal CartyJack Bradley- Clarke, PhD, Convatec, Deeside, Flintshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-4506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to use computer simulations to generate quantitative insights as to how the characteristics of convex skin barriers might contribute to stomal protrusion or leveling of the peristomal skin when applied to 3 different types of abdomens varying in thickness and tone of the subcutaneous fat. MATERIALS AND

methodsFinite element analysis (FEA) was used to model the interactions of convex skin barriers with 3 different types of abdomens. The skin barriers' depth, slope, tension location, and compressibility were systematically varied, and the model was used to simulate how each combination deformed the peristomal tissue when applied. The results were analyzed using factorial regression analysis to reveal which characteristics of convexity contribute most to generating central and peripheral tension. The influence of flexibility was not measured as our simulation did not capture the bending motion required to flex the skin barrier.

conclusionsDepth and tension location were identified as the most influential factors in promoting central tension, whereas slope and depth most influenced peripheral tension. These findings further our understanding of the 5 main characteristics of convexity and may assist with appropriate selection of convex skin barriers for a person living with an ostomy.

Indexed as

AbdomenComputer SimulationSkinFinite Element AnalysisHumansOstomyConvexityOstomyPeristomal skin damageRetracted stomaStoma

Identifiers

PMID40994176
PMCPMC12506684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.